ACLU Supports, COWS ACLU Supports Legalized Child Pornography 
Legalized Drugs
Tax Exemptions for Satanists
Legalized Prostitution
Abortion on Demand
Mandatory Sex Education
Busing School Vouchers and Home Schooling
Ideological Tests for Court Appointees
Automatic Entitled Probation
Public Demonstrations by Nazis and Communists Public
Legalized Polygamy Teaching "
 
ACLU Opposes
Sobriety Check Points
Legalized Optional School Prayer
Tax Exemptions for Churches
Religious Displays in Public
Medical Safety Reporting
Parental Consent Laws
School Vouchers and Home Schooling
Government Ethics Committees
Prison Terms for Criminal Offenses
Demonstrations for Direct Action by Pro-lifers
Monogamous Hetreosexual Intercourse within Marriage" in Public Schools
LIBERAL KEYWORDS, ALL CONSERVATIVES MAKE A COPY :
[Key words & phrases: criticism, skepticism, epic battle,
 controversial, heavily weighted, wealthiest, wartime,
 blame, class warfare, throwing a bone to the rich,
 spend money to make money, real drag, difficult year,
 spending, more expensive, defensive,
liberal keywords: legalize....usually illegal drugs or bizarre sex
skewed to benefit the rich, the evil RICH, OIL IS THE REASON LIBERAL Key words & phrases: No immediate benefit, cost the
 government (HELL WITH TAXPAYERS), money that could be spent in other ways (LIKE STUDYING MATING HABITS OF ALASKAN BUTTERFLIES), CLINTON GAVE A 600,000 DOLLAR GRANT FOR THAT.
growing concern, bad shape, far-reaching proposals,
massive tax cut, trickle-down economics, plow savings back
 into the economy, epic political battle, working poor,
cash-poor state governments, growing deficit.]
Cows & Politics Explained A CHRISTIAN DEMOCRAT:  You have two cows.  You keep one and give one to your neighbor. A SOCIALIST:  You have two cows.  The government takes one and gives it to your neighbor. AN AMERICAN REPUBLICAN:  You have two cows. Your neighbor has none. So what? AN AMERICAN DEMOCRAT:  You have two cows.  Your neighbor has none.  You feel guilty for being successful.  You vote people into office who tax your cows, forcing you to sell one to raise money to pay the tax.  The people you voted for then take the tax money and buy a cow and give it to your neighbor. You feel righteous. A COMMUNIST:  You have two cows.  The government seizes both and provides you with milk. A FASCIST:  You have two cows.  The government seizes both and sells you the milk. You join the underground and start a campaign of sabotage. A ISLAMO-FASCIST:  You have 2 CAMELS.....  The government seizes both and sells you the milk. You join the underground and start a campaign of sabotage.
DEMOCRACY, AMERICAN STYLE:  You have two cows.  The government taxes you to the point you have to sell both to support a man in a foreign country who has only one cow, which was a gift from your government. CAPITALISM, AMERICAN STYLE:  You have two cows.  You sell one, buy a bull, and build a herd of cows. BUREAUCRACY, AMERICAN STYLE:  You have two cows.  The government takes them both, shoots one, milks the other, pays you for the milk, then pours the milk down the drain. AN AMERICAN CORPORATION:  You have two cows.  You sell one, and force the other to produce the milk of four cows.  You are surprised when the cow drops dead. A FRENCH CORPORATION:  You have two cows.  You go on strike because you want three cows. A JAPANESE CORPORATION:  You have two cows.  You redesign them so they are one-tenth the size of an ordinary cow and produce twenty times the milk. You then create clever cow cartoon images called Cowkimon and market them World-Wide. A GERMAN CORPORATION:  You have two cows.  You reengineer them so they live for 100 years, eat once a month, and milk themselves. MOOOOOOOO!
A BRITISH CORPORATION:  You have two cows.  They are mad.  They die. Pass the shepherd's pie, please. AN ITALIAN CORPORATION:  You have two cows, but you don't know where they are. You break for lunch. A RUSSIAN CORPORATION:  You have two cows.  You count them and learn you have five cows. You count them again and learn you have 42 cows. You count them again and learn you have 12 cows.  You stop counting cows and open another bottle of vodka. A SWISS CORPORATION:  You have 5000 cows, none of which belong to you. You charge others for storing them. A BRAZILIAN CORPORATION:  You have two cows.  You enter into a partnership with an American corporation.  Soon you have 1000 cows and the American corporation declares bankruptcy. AN INDIAN CORPORATION:  You have two cows.  You worship both of them. A CHINESE CORPORATION:  You have two cows.  You have 300 people milking them. You claim full employment, high bovine productivity, and arrest the newsman who reported on them. AN ISRAELI CORPORATION:  There are these two Jewish cows, right?  They open a milk factory, an ice cream store, and then sell the movie rights. They send their calves to Harvard to become doctors. So, who needs people? AN ARKANSAS CORPORATION:  You have two cows.  That one on the left is kinda cute.

ANTI-HETEROSEXUAL 18, THE MENSCH, REAL MAN
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=8405
How I Became a "Mensch" (After Feminism Stole My Identity)
by Henry Makow Ph.D. (My first Internet article, from Aug. 2000. Updated April 13 2008. "Mensch" is Yiddish for a man.) When I was 21 years old, and living in Israel, I received a letter from my mother. She had taken my savings and invested in a town house. "Now, you are a mensch," she said. I wondered what she meant. How did owning a house make me "a man?" I wanted to be defined by my character, not by my property. I came of age at a time when youth was "looking for identity." I was searching for it in Israel. Later, I became a Canadian nationalist. In each case, I didn't find identity in "community." I had a strong patriarchal father, an excellent role model. He built a successful career, and supported a family. "Work is the backbone of a man," he would tell me. "It's the most important decision a man makes. A wife is the second most important." But for some reason, his example didn't register. Why didn't it? For centuries men have defined their identities in terms of masculinity. Why was I so clueless? I was a feminist. ATTACK ON GENDER AND FAMILY I grew up in an era that has bought the feminist lie that men and women are identical. In our culture, women are encouraged to do everything men do, and vice versa. I believe in equal opportunity but I mistook "equal" for "identical", and this retarded my personal development by 25 years. I doubt if I am alone. "Identical" made me look for myself in a mate. I was literally attracted to lithe young women with cropped boyish haircuts: my own persona. Thus, I put a woman on a pedestal because she had my identity. She could give it back to me. Some women were immediately repelled. Others enjoyed the adulation for a while, but eventually lost respect. What I needed was someone quite different from me, my feminine complement. Eventually feminism will be recognized for what it is: a virulently anti social, anti-feminine, anti heterosexual ideology that has achieved extraordinary power by pretending to champion women's rights. By fooling society, they have been able to enact policies which emasculate men and encourage women to become masculine. In other words, women have usurped the masculine identity, and in the process, both sexes have lost their own. Unbelievably, the destruction of heterosexuality is the stated goal of feminists who believe gender difference is not only unnatural but also the source of all injustice. Most people don't realize that the current feminist movement is an anachronism from the Cold War and the Marxist revolutionary sixties. Most of the leading feminist thinkers, including Betty Friedan and Simone de Beauvoir, have been Marxists, and many have also been lesbians. But they would not have succeeded if they had been up front about their bizarre revolutionary goal, which is to destroy healthy heterosexual behavior and the family. Feminism is about power not choice. "No women should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children," said feminist founder Simone de Beauvoir. "Women should not have that choice, because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one" (Saturday Review, June 14, 1975). If feminism were really about choices, it would not indoctrinate women to enter the work force and become "independent." It would not demonize men and heterosexual love. Feminism is essentially a lesbian movement in the sense that lesbians have always been women who coveted the male role. It is based on Marxist notions of "equality" and class conflict that have been discredited and rejected, notions that have no relevance to a mystical and biological reality such as love. The breakdown in the traditional family caused by feminism, is quite simply, the main reason for our social, personal and existential problems. People have always derived their primary meaning and purpose from familial roles (e.g. daughter, wife, and mother) and from the life-cycle rituals, (marriage, birth and death). Indeed, marriage and family are a God-given Path to achieve love and personal fulfillment. We do not find wholeness by trying to incorporate masculine and feminine in ourselves but by uniting with our opposite. Heterosexual love is the attraction of opposites. Indeed, as heterosexuals we define themselves in terms of these differences. If we are male, we are not female, and vice-versa, like dark and light. Because I denied these differences, I didn't know who I was. I didn't understand women, and I didn't know how to relate to them. RECLAIMING MASCULINITY I was almost 50-years-old before I solved the riddle. A book "The Flight from Woman" (1964) by Karl Stern, a prominent Canadian psychiatrist, confirmed what my instincts were telling me. My mother had been right all along. A man makes the house; the woman makes the home. According to Stern, masculinity is defined by "power" over the natural and social environment. Men provide the physical and cultural context for the private world of love. They are the do'ers: adventurers and builders, protectors and providers. Femininity is defined by "loving relationships." Feminine psychology is founded on nurturing and loving husbands and children, and thereby being needed and loved in return. Women are the engines of love, acting much like the heart in the body. They create the family that is the fundamental building block of society and the foundry of the future. Men define themselves by deeds; women simply are love: beauty, grace, faith and goodness. Men tend to be rational and objective; women subjective, intuitive and emotional. Distinctions like these need not constrict us. They are a theme upon which to play our own variations. For example, my wife mows the lawn; I do all the shopping and cooking. But without the theme, there is confusion and chaos. The feminist gospel that traditional sex roles are "oppressive" is typical Marxist social subversion. For many people, a flexible interpretation of traditional roles may be essential for happiness and fulfillment. I extrapolated from Karl Stern's distinctions. If man is motivated by power and woman by love, heterosexual love must be an exchange of the two. A woman surrenders her power, in trust. This is how a woman expresses her love: by trusting. In this way, women actually empower men. If a man betrays this trust, he loses his power. In return for her power, a woman gets what she really wants: a man's power expressed as his intense, undivided love. He includes her in his sphere of self-interest: this is how two people become one. Her happiness is his happiness. He can't hurt her without hurting himself. RECLAIMING FEMININITY Teaching women to seek masculine power prevents them from getting what they really want. Women want to be possessed by a man's love. God's love of Creation is mirrored in a man's love of a woman. A girlfriend once told me, "I want to be used." In a way, a man channels God's love to a woman by making her a wife and (possibly) a mother. Women want masculine power, but it must be in a man. The same girlfriend also said that without a man, she feels "like a rudderless boat." Similarly, a man without a woman is a rudder without a boat. A man cannot love a woman who is competing with him for power. Relationships between so-called "equals" are like mergers, or roommates. One psychiatrist, Irene Claremont de Castillejo, calls them "brother-sister" marriages (Knowing Women: A Feminine Psychology, 1973). They cannot achieve the intimacy as when a woman surrenders her will to a man, and a man returns this trust with his wholehearted love. Some psychiatrists say her sexual satisfaction is also linked to her ability to trust and surrender. Feminine women are creatures of God. In love, they sacrifice their "selves" for love, which in many religions is the key to transcendence. Helen Deutsch remarked on this masochist-narcissist syndrome in her The Psychology of Women: A Psychoanalytic Interpretation (1944). The majority of women only achieve fulfillment as wives and mothers. In their hearts, they know it. Nor can women love men with whom they compete. Women are hypergamous which means they seek men of higher status than themselves. Even the most ardent heterosexual feminist can only love someone more powerful than she. The struggle for power is poisoning male-female relations. It is the death of love. Men cannot give up their defining characteristic and expect to be men. Women cannot criticize and challenge men and expect to have satisfying relationships. When I comprehended this, I felt liberated. I established a healthy relationship with a woman who is my female complement, and married her. CONCLUSION
The universal complaint is that men no longer know how to be men; women don't know how to be women. It helps to see heterosexual love as a mystical dance. In a dance, the male leads, the female follows. You can't have a graceful dance without each partner playing his part. The dance is based on love. The male is always considering his mate's wishes because he loves her. In some cases, he will ask her to lead. As in a ballroom dance, who can say which role is more important. Both partners are of equal value. The dance requires both the leadership and dynamism of the male; and the beauty, love and grace of the female. In the dance of love, two people become one, and the fruit of this mystical union, is often a child. Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order." (www.cruelhoax.ca) His articles can be found at his web site www.henrymakow.com He enjoys receiving your comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com
Last updated 15/04/2008

http://www.lc.org/index.cfm?PID=14102&AlertID=825
ANTI-HETEROSEXUAL19, TO THE KIDS
LU AFFILIATED SITES:  EDUCATION  Liberty University Distance Learning Resident Admissions School of Law Liberty Theological Seminary Liberty Christian Academy Liberty Online Academy Liberty Home Bible Institute
Liberty Alert
April 16, 2008 Students Have the Right Not to Remain Silent on the Day of Silence The annual "Day of Silence," sponsored by the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network (GLSEN), will be celebrated in many public schools next week. This event encourages students to remain silent on April 25. GLSEN claims the event counteracts bullying, but it is merely promoting an anti-heterosexual viewpoint. Schools can teach students the value of respect without accepting GLSEN’s propaganda event. Many states, like Florida, for example, have laws that require abstinence-based education when sexuality is discussed. In those states the school cannot recognize the Day of Silence without promoting abstinence. Liberty Counsel is encouraging students to mount a counter-celebration to promote a positive message of purity on the Day of Silence. Students are encouraged to wear white and to distribute flyers promoting sexual purity whenever other students are permitted to distribute literature promoting the Day of Silence. We have posted informational flyers and resources on our Day of Purity web site to promote abstinence. The flyers include information about relationships, STDs and related topics. Some school administrators do not understand that students cannot be penalized for refusing to observe the Day of Silence. Here are some recent complaints Liberty Counsel has received: Florida - A principal told a father that if his son was not at school on the Day of Silence that the boy would fail the school year. Indiana - A public school is participating in the Day of Silence against the wishes of some parents. Parents were told that it is "against the law" to cancel the program and that any absences would be unexcused that day. Iowa - A school board member told a former student that a student refusing to speak on the Day of Silence was not anymore disruptive in a school setting than a "Christian wearing a cross." Oklahoma - A high school graduate wrote to her former principal to protest the celebration of the Day of Silence. The principal said that if he did not allow the Day of Silence, he could not allow Bible clubs and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. South Dakota - A student was told that if she is absent on the Day of Silence, she must write a paper explaining why she will not participate. Students are not required to participate in the Day of Silence. Parents who do not want their children exposed to GLSEN's anti-family agenda can choose to keep their children home. We have prepared a letter that explains that students can choose not to participate in the Day of Silence. If your child is being discriminated against for not observing the Day of Silence, call Liberty Counsel at 800-671-1776. If you send an email, please include your name, address, daytime telephone number and the best time to return your call. Please pray that students will be protected from forced indoctrination by GLSEN, especially next week, and that the truth will prevail. God's Grace And The Homosexual Next Door Author Alan Chambers (a former homosexual) and his colleagues at Exodus International offer practical and biblical insights on how both individuals and churches can become a haven for homosexuals seeking freedom from same-sex attraction. In this comprehensive guide to helping homosexuals, readers will learn about the roots of homosexuality, God's radical grace for sexual sinners, how to reach youth both within and outside the church, dealing with fear and ignorance in the church, leading homosexuals to Christ, mentoring homosexuals in the church, three degrees of homosexuality: militant, moderate or repentant, what not to do in reaching out to homosexuals and much more about this often perplexing subject. A suggested donation of $16.00 includes shipping and handling. Order online or by calling Liberty Counsel at 800-671-1776.
Praise the Lord for our Friends at TMA who underwrite this Liberty Alert ... TMA Inc. International - Church Architects and Master Planners - Valdosta, GA
TMA is a team of Christ-centered design professionals committed to excellence in architecture, planning and service to our clients from concept through occupancy for JESUS' sake. Hebrews 11:1. For a Free CD about TMA, call 1-800-932-6124 or info@tmaincintl.com. 
Liberty Counsel · Post Office Box 540774, Orlando, FL 32854 · (800) 671-1776 · ©Copyright 1995-2008

ANTI-HETEROSEXUAL 20, FOLEY, LIBERAL CHRISTIANS, FISTGATE WWW.MASSNEWS HAS OODLES OF STORIES ON "FISTGATE", DO A SEARCH, MIGHT BREAK YOU PEW-SITTERS
THIS WILL BE THE LAST OF THESE, IF I HAVEN'T SHOWN YOU THE DEPTH OF THIS PROBLEM, GET A HEAD EXAM, FAITH EXAM?
Mark Foley's America
By Lee Duigon
www.MichNews.com
Oct 3, 2006 What's the most nauseating nuance of the media orgasm over the Foley flap? It has to be the "liberal Christian" pundits trying to use the story to argue that all opposition to sodomy is pure hypocrisy. Their line of pseudo-reasoning goes: Congressman Mark Foley is a "family values" guy, a typical example of the Republican Party and the Christian Right. Now Foley has been caught exchanging dirty messages with teenage boys. Therefore--ta-dah!--everyone who stands for these "values" is a secret sod like Foley; and furthermore, the "values" themselves are wrong, and ought to be discarded ASAP. I put "values" in quotes because what we're really talking about, or should be talking about, is the Biblical truth that homosexual behavior, or any other form of fornication or adultery, is an abomination to God. And do you know what? Even if every single one of us who proclaims this teaching were to be exposed as a practicing pedophile, the teaching would still be true. If every one of us were to drop dead, it would still be true. It's not true because we say it is, but because God says so, in the Bible. As St. Paul put it, "yea, let God be true, but every man a liar" (Romans 3:4). When we say soliciting sex from minors is evil, we're not merely expressing our personal opinion. We are saying something that is absolutely, non-negotiably true, independently of our personal moral status. It would be true no matter who said it. There are other issues involved in the Foley fracas. Who, for instance, had Foley's private messages in his possession, and how did he get them? Why did he turn them over to the media, instead of to law enforcement? And how long did he wait until he did it? It is impossible that only Republicans in the House of Representatives knew about Congressman Foley's misbehavior. So why did none of the Democrats in the House blow the whistle on him? Could it be that there are Democrat Congressmen who are in the same boat? Then there's the outraged rug-chewing by the same media clowns who a week earlier were lionizing Jim McGreevy. And if you think Rep. Foley's cyber-conversations were lurid, turn on your computer and visit the websites of Planned Parenthood's "Teenwire" and Rutgers University's "Sex Etc." newsletter for teens. Both are used in public schools as sex education materials. And if you have a really strong stomach, see what the Massachusetts Dept. of Education presented to high school children in a 2000 "Teach-Out" conference at Tufts University--an event better known by its nickname, "Fistgate." Some of the kids in attendance were only 12 years old (see www.massnews.com). Nor should we omit to mention that the National Education Assn. this summer, at its national convention, announced that the number one priority for public schools in America is to teach children to support "gay marriage." If there is such a thing as Foleyism, it saturates our whole society. It's in our news media, our movies, and commercials, in our public schools and universities, and even in our churches. Which is not to say most people practice it; but we've certainly done a good job of condoning it. If the moral law does not come down from the mountain, written with the finger of God, it isn't moral law at all, but only someone's opinion. God gave us moral laws because He knew we couldn't generate our own. We'd only wind up changing them every time public opinion had another hiccup. America's skin-deep, lukewarm, half-hearted Christianity is the root cause of Foleyism,
AMEN TO THAT,BEN FRANKLIN SAID, "A DEMOCRACY CAN ONLY STAND AMONG A MORAL PEOPLES", IS AMERICA MORAL? WELCOME TO OBAMA'S USSA
or whatever else you want to call it. Are the citizens in Mark Foley's district the only Americans who--some of them knowingly--elected an immoral man to public office? Wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say no more... God's commandments stand for all time, and we ignore them at our peril. The bus of moral lawlessness stops at Foley Street. It will not take us to the Promised Land. Copyright by Lee Duigon
Lee Duigon is a Christian freelance writer whose work can be seen regularly at www.chalcedon.edu.
Copyright ? MichNews.com. All Rights Reserved.
---------------
GONNA HAVE TO LOOK THESE UP          -------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
Fistgate Cartoon Unimportant People
Need Not Apply Copyright ©2001 Massachusetts News, Inc. Photocopying and data processing storage of all or any part of this issue may not be made without prior written consent. 
 Fistgate Archive
Your resource for Massachusetts News coverage of the 2000 and 2001 annual GLSEN conferences, their repercussions and related stories
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
http://www.massnews.com/past_issues/2000/Schools/fistar
c.htm Fistgate Teachers Knew They Were Violating Trust
Did Weld and Cellucci Know? Does Gov. Swift Understand?
MN September 5, 2001 Camenker Vindicated by Reinstatement of Fistgate Teacher
The woman who taught homosexual sex at Fistgate, Margot Abels, now believes she is a heroine because an arbitrator has reinstated her in her job
MN August 24, 2001 Opposition to Cellucci Nomination Is Widespead 
Archive of MN exclusives and other coverage of Bush's nomination of Cellucci as ambassador 
MN  
 
Editorial
What Should Gov. Swift Do About Fistgate? 
What should Gov. Swift do about Fistgates I and II? 
MN April 13, 2001 Fistgate II Was Almost Canceled Because of Last Year’s Fallout
Dept. of Education employee still seeks 'explicit education'
MN April 3, 2001 Homosexual Lawyers Try to Hide What Happened at Fistgate
Case involving 'whistleblower' parents is heading for trial
MN March 30, 2001 Tired of Liberal Rage
Liberals use the word "tolerance" like ketchup -- they put it on top of anything that that might not taste so good by itself, Brian Camenker says in his letter
MN March 30, 2001 Fistgate II Teaches More Sexual Activity for Young ‘Homosexuals’
Held in same building as last year, but this year included more students and sex kit
MN March 26, 2001 Public Hearing on New Parents Rights Bill
Would make homosexual programs 'opt-in,' give parents choice
MN March 26, 2001 Mass. Residents Learn Fraudulent Basis Of Sex-Ed
CWA offers positive blueprint for action
MN March 21, 2001 Margery Eagan Explains Why She Replaced Jeannine Graf at 96.9 FM
Eagan pimps for Cellucci and homosexual activists
MN March 15, 2001 Eagan's column:
Unenlightened bigot taking aim at Cellucci
Boston Herald MI: To Avoid Lawsuit, Schools Agree Not to Promote Homosexual Agenda or Enforce Unconstitutional Speech Code
Traverse City schools agree not to prohibit students from expressing disapproval of homosexuality in exchange for delay in legal action
American Family Association PR March 14, 2001 Media Watch
‘Justice for Families’ Challenges Herald Columnist for Laughing at Public Sex
Columnist also calls Brian Camenker 'over-vigilant' for being concerned about 'fistgate'
March 6, 2001 Letter About Fistgate Circulates at Inauguration
What is wrong in Massachusetts?
January 23, 2001  Fistgate Instructor Was Paid by State
Says she received approval from supervisor, DOE's John Bynoe; DOE denies prior knowledge
January 23, 2001  Pro-abortion Bill Baird and Pro-life's Joe Reilly Both Praise Jeannine Graf
Say her departure would be a loss to the community
January 16, 2001 Jeannine Graf Fired for Exposing Fistgate
Popular talk show host is punished by 96.9FM-WTKK
January 9, 2001 Related:
Boston Globe began the smear
Many upset about firing of Jeannine Graf
Ray Neary is troubled
Jeannine Graf fired because of Civil Rights Act
  
Veteran Teacher Traumatized at Fistgate
Keeping children out of sex-ed doesn't guarantee safety, says teacher
December 2000 Angry Parents Clash with Superintendent Over Indoctrination of Children
Homosexuality in tolerance unit is cancelled in Acushnet
October 2000 Only Gays Come to Unitarian Meeting About Acushnet
About 50 people -- mostly gay activists and Unitarian supporters -- attend
October 2000 Another Lesbian Uses Holocaust to Advance Homosexuality in Middle School
'Set stage' for public 'coming out' with holocaust story
October 2000 Judge van Gestel Assaulted the First Amendment
Leading liberal columnist Nat Hentoff expresses his outrage
October 2000 Brian Camenker Receives Award for Exposing Fistgate Scandal
Honored at Washington, D.C., banquet
October 2000 Alan Keyes Electrifies Fistgate Rally
Former Ambassador to the UN expressed outrage about the homosexual activism against children in our schools
September 2000 Lexington Parents Take Interest in Wake of Fistgate
Concern about schools co-sponsoring a homosexual weekend
September 2000 Doctor Gives Affidavit In Fistgate Case
Medical doctor John R. Diggs's Affidavit in favor of parents; Outlines 'significant medical and health risks' associated with what was taught to students at Fistgate
August 2000 'Parents' No Longer Recognized By Schools
Daycare centers are closely monitored
August 2000 Students Given Graphic Instruction In Homosexual Sex
Reprint of a story which broke the Fistgate scandal in the May issue
August 2000 Fistgate Scandal In A Nutshell Fistgate Revisted
Fistgate Conference WORKSHOPS, March 25, 2000
August 2000
The Fistgate Report
Gay activists describe 'fisting' at school-sponsored even to children as young as 12-years-old
May 2000 "Fisting [forcing one’s entire hand into another person’s rectum or vagina] often gets a bad rap....[It’s] an experience of letting somebody into your body that you want to be that close and intimate with...[and] to put you into an exploratory mode."
The above quotation comes from Massachusetts Department of Education employees describing the pleasures of homosexual sex to a group of high school students at a state-sponsored annual workshop on March 25, 2000.

ANTI-HETEROSEXUAL 21, UNSAFE AT ANY GRADE
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/801027/posts
Free Republic
Unsafe At Any Grade
Citizen Magazine ^ | 12/4/02 | Candi Cushman Posted on Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:34:06 PM by CalConservative Unsafe at Any Grade Homosexual activists are exploiting their agenda through "safe school" laws across the nation - and California is their latest laboratory. By Candi Cushman
It’s 1 o’clock in the morning and 27-year-old Lybe Crumpton is standing alone, shaking and on the verge of tears. No, she hasn’t been robbed. She’s a fifth-grade teacher who’s afraid her students might be harmed by the homosexual agenda. A petite brunette with large brown eyes, she has just watched her school board approve the idea that classrooms like hers play a video called That’s A Family!, featuring 9- and 10-year-old children lauding the benefits of living with two moms or two dads. “My dads are gay, and gay means . . . two men or two women love each other,” says one smiling girl in the video. “It’s sort of like having a mom and a dad love each other, just that it is a man and a man.” But that’s not the worst of it. The video — which also portrays children of divorced, single and even jailed parents — comes with a teachers’ handbook including a crossword puzzle for elementary kids using words like “transgender” and discussion questions such as, “What did you learn from this video about families with gay parents? What else would you like to know?” It was five hours ago that Crumpton slipped unnoticed into the back of the Novato, Calif., school board meeting and heard gay-rights activists warning the board it had better allow “tolerance” lessons like this video — or risk lawsuits. That upsets Crumpton because she doesn’t think elementary-school kids are ready to discuss sexual lifestyles, especially one as physically and spiritually devastating as homosexuality. “They’re not worried about who is sleeping with whom,” she says. “They worry about who’s the best at soccer.” But after pro-gay activists and parents faced off over the video into the pre-dawn hours, the board voted to test the film in fifth-grade classes and consider introducing it to more grades next year. “They are just opening a Pandora’s box,” Crumpton told Citizen moments after the vote. Exploiting Danger What’s happening in Novato, an affluent Bay-area suburb in Northern California, has become increasingly common across the nation as homosexual activists use “safe school” laws and concerns over school bullying to advance their agenda. It works like this: First, homosexual activists tout “hate crimes” — those sad but rare incidents in which students are harmed because they are gay — and then they push for laws protecting homosexual students. Once those laws pass, activists persuade schools to adopt curricula that promotes not just student safety, but acceptance of homosexuality. “Making schools safe . . . is strongly tied to ensuring that classrooms are inclusive of LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender] themes,” said the Web site for one of the nation’s largest homosexual lobby groups — the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). GLSEN’s executive director, Kevin Jennings, made no secret of that strategy while extolling homosexual activists’ inroads into Massachusetts schools a few years ago. “We immediately seized upon the opponents’ calling card — safety,” he said. “We knew that, confronted with real-life stories of youth who had suffered from homophobia, our opponents would automatically be on the defensive. . . . This allowed us to set the terms of the debate.” So far the tactic is working; at least eight states have passed safe school laws to protect gay and lesbian students, and five more (including Florida and New York) are considering similar legislation. But it’s California schools that have taken the lead. Over the last two years, legislators in Sacramento have cranked out laws requiring curriculum to reflect “appreciation” of different sexual lifestyles and adding “sexual orientation” to school discrimination policies. Those laws leave schools that resist homosexual pressure vulnerable to lawsuits, explained Jeff McAlpin, a Novato school board member who voted against pro-homosexual curriculum. “The state of California has put us in a very difficult position,” he said. “We don’t have a choice in terms of providing protection [for homosexual rights], so then the question becomes how far do we go? “It puts you at some level of risk if they can prove you didn’t have a safe environment.” And that risk has cast the door wide open to homosexual activists wielding the threat of lawsuits. The Gay-Straight Alliance Network (GSA), for instance — a group that openly pushes for the normalization of homosexuality through student clubs — has issued a fact sheet urging activists to “think of AB 537 [a California safe school law] as a tool and use it as leverage to work to change the school climate.” Apparently, members took their marching orders seriously. After homosexual students in Visalia, Calif., complained of harassment, their district was punished with a federal court settlement under AB 537 that forced teachers to receive mandatory gay-rights training. This year, the district’s ninth-grade students also will attend court-ordered classes taught by the GSA. While the case does not directly apply to Novato, said McAlpin, “It was clearly a shot across the bows of all school districts that [safe school laws] had an impact on one district . . . and other districts better be careful.” ‘Part of the Price’ If the California education system is the latest gay-rights laboratory, then the Hayward Unified School District is its most successful experiment. Unlike Novato, with its Victorian homes and white picket fences, Hayward is an industrial town on the south side of the Bay filled with cinderblock buildings and windowless factories. But just like Novato, Christian teachers in Hayward feel forced to promote a political agenda. “Our backs are against the wall,” said Matthew Freschi, a physical education teacher at Hayward High School. “We feel the need to step forward. Enough is enough.” What pushed Freschi into action was the “2-4-6-8 Are you sure you’re really straight?” sign he discovered on his gymnasium door, as well as the staff meeting he attended at which teachers were encouraged to assign students library books about homosexuals. Both incidents were billed as the school’s effort to foster safety for gay and lesbian students. “I agree that no student should be abused or battered for any reason,” Freschi said, “but to me that’s not protecting anybody; that’s promoting something.” Indeed, Hayward is the perfect case study of how safe school laws create special privileges for some and oppression for others. Just ask Monica Manriquez, a Spanish teacher who had her pay docked last year for refusing to attend a seminar endorsing homosexuality. When Hayward school officials ordered teachers to attend “sensitivity” training on April 8, Manriquez and three colleagues at Tennyson High School requested permission to opt out. “We didn’t want to sit and be indoctrinated for four hours,” said Manriquez, who’d already suffered through previous sensitivity sessions. “I have no problem with being sensitive, but what they mean by that is that we have to be pro-gay in our classrooms.” After the principal denied their request, the teachers sought help from the Pacific Justice Institute, a Sacramento-based Christian legal organization, which argued that civil-rights laws protect religious freedom in the workplace. But school officials claimed safe school laws trumped those rights, in a letter stating that “the District has an obligation to ensure that its employees are properly trained in applicable law.” A few days later, the teachers received notice their pay would be docked for missing half a day. “These teachers offered to work [in their classroom], so the issue was not their willingness to work,” said Brad Dacus, chief counsel for the institute. “The issue was the intolerance of the school district . . . that would force teachers to compromise their convictions as Christians.” That wasn’t the end of their troubles. Dubbed “The Tennyson Four” by media, the teachers were derided in local newspapers and ostracized at work. “These four teachers are out of touch with the standards of our community,” wrote the Hayward Daily Review in an editorial. “It’s possible that some public school students in Hayward are being assigned to a teacher who hates them. . . . Their human rights should outweigh teachers’ ‘religious rights.’ ” “Nobody would talk to us for a while,” added Manriquez. “But that’s part of the price.” As the Hayward school district quietly trampled on religious freedom, it drew national attention for a resolution granting homosexual teachers the right to declare their homosexuality “without fear of reprisal” and bring up homosexual relationships in class without parental consent. Once again waiving the safe school banner, the April 10 resolution asserted that a “crisis exists in Hayward” and called for “ongoing sensitivity training” and curriculum that provides “positive images of GLBT [gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender] people in the classroom.” In a newspaper interview, Tennyson drama teacher Kelsey Hartman expressed relief that she could now talk about her lesbianism and have students read a play featuring two women falling in love without fear of punishment: “Now I know we have support,” she said. “If I’m ashamed, it shows the students there’s something wrong with it.” But Christian teachers don’t have the same protection. At previous sensitivity seminars, Manriquez said she was told “our religion is not to be brought up. We are to talk about our culture, but not our religion.” Courage Under Fire Another Christian teacher who did attend the April 8 training, Cynthia Huggett, says Manriquez was right to stay away. When Huggett arrived, the first thing she saw was a display of newspaper articles about The Tennyson Four. “There was a lot of negativity toward them,” Huggett remembered. “I heard comments . . . like they couldn’t understand why those teachers couldn’t be here. . . . What’s their problem? “I was kind of wondering myself, well, why are these four people refusing to go?” She soon found out. During sessions led by educators from area schools, religion was constantly ridiculed, said Huggett. In a seminar video called Teaching Respect, for instance, a presenter matter-of-factly listed people homosexual students could go to for help, including parents and teachers, but when he got to the word “pastor,” he stopped. “He paused, and he looked at the audience to get a laugh out of it like, ‘Right . . . Christians hate gays.’ . . . If anything it would be somebody that they would not trust. That was the gist of it,” said Huggett, a Tennyson math teacher. She recalled her shock when other teachers laughed: “I was thinking, ‘Why are they laughing? Here this was called ‘sensitivity’ awareness. . . . It reminded me of Polish jokes, Jewish jokes. First you start with joking, you break the ice by saying we can make fun of these people now.” According to Huggett and others interviewed by Citizen, the video also claimed that biblical references about Jesus sitting at the right hand of God were used to discriminate against left-handed people. “They used Scripture to point out the fact that . . . Christians have a history from the beginning of bashing homosexuality and people who are different because God said so,” said Huggett. “I thought, ‘How dare you say I can’t stand up and talk to my kids about what I believe and bring out the Bible, but you can go ahead for your purposes and actually misquote [the Bible]?’ ” By the time the lunch break rolled around, Huggett was too distraught to stay, so she sought comfort at home in a daily devotional book. To her surprise, Hebrews 12:2, a verse that describes Jesus sitting at the right hand of God, was referenced on that day’s page. “To come home and see it in my journal . . . it was one of those moments in my Christian walk that I felt was the closest thing to God just opening his mouth and talking to me,” Huggett said. “It was like, ‘Yes Cindy, you are right. . . . You see what’s going on. You see the evil in it. You understand it. And I’m going to let you know by Scripture.’ ” Emboldened, she spoke her mind a few days later at a faculty meeting. “I strongly feel that if I don’t say something, this will continue and Christians will be bashed again and again,” she told Citizen. “And I’m not going to let that happen. I will not stay here if that is going to happen. I will lose my job and wash dishes if I have to.” Cinderfella? So what does coercing Christian teachers into attending seminars that belittle their religion have to do with teaching homosexuality to kids? The answer is simple: To advance their cause, homosexual activists must first undermine beliefs that categorize right and wrong behavior. “We’ve seen the same pattern emerge over and over,” said Scott Lively, who as director of the Pro-Family Law Center has tracked homosexual infiltration into Vermont, Oregon and Massachusetts school districts. “The gay agenda is first pushed to teachers, then they are trained how to get it in the classroom. They are being trained that it is acceptable, even expected, to trample on the private beliefs and values of the students in their care.” Citizen obtained handouts from the Hayward sensitivity seminars over the past two years that illustrate this agenda. A “What You Can Do” list distributed at one of this year’s seminars, for instance, suggested that teachers “say the words often — lesbian, gay, bisexual — in a positive way” and “identify gay, lesbian, bisexual contributors throughout the curriculum.” Another handout encouraged schools to “bring in openly gay, lesbian, bisexual adults as resources in classes and assemblies” and identify staff who “are gay-friendly and to whom questioning students may go for advice.” Demonstrating blatant disregard for parental control, yet another page entitled “If a Student Comes Out to You” told teachers “if trust and openness exist, sexual behavior could also be addressed.” For teachers in need of more indoctrination tools, a “Resources” list distributed at a 2001 seminar recommended several gay-rights curricula, including “Preventing Prejudice: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Lesson Plans for Elementary Schools.” A copy of “Preventing Prejudice” obtained by Citizen includes a lesson plan for first- and second-graders entitled “Who Loves Whom? LGBT Relationships.” The plan encourages teachers to introduce the lesson on Valentine’s Day “to broaden the definition of love that is associated with that holiday” and to “ask students to rewrite stories that involve heterosexual relationships, e.g., fairy tales like Cinderella, substituting LGBT relationships.” A kindergarten lesson included in the same curriculum called “Jesse’s Dream Skirt” tells a story about a little boy who is praised for wearing a dress to school. According to Hayward district spokesperson Kim Hammond, those lesson plans, as well as books like Heather Has Two Mommies, are “available to all staff in the district.” “What disturbs me most,” said Huggett, “is that once you say this should be part of our curriculum, [teachers] will have to appear to believe that homosexuality is a normal, healthy lifestyle.” Given the pressure on teachers, the only hope for public education is parental outrage, said one East Bay-area administrator who spoke to Citizen on the condition of anonymity: “There will be no resistance [to pro-homosexual curriculum] from within the system, from the administration. There might be individual teachers who object, but the union is lock-stock in step with this. As a matter of fact, much of the leadership is controlled by these people anyway.” When his school had a gay-pride day, there wasn’t a peep of protest, the administrator said. “If the phones were ringing off the hooks the day after they did that . . . saying, ‘How dare you?’ believe me, it would have empowered the staff to say, ‘You know this is really taking things too far.’ But the great masses just seem to be, I don’t know, asleep.” Signs of Hope Back in Novato, though, there are signs parents are waking up. “When they talk about doing this to my kid behind my back, it ticks me off. It really makes my blood boil and I can’t just sit back and say nothing,” said 33-year-old Susan Barnes, who said she’ll remove her second-grader from public school if homosexual curriculum is adopted. To prevent that from happening, Barnes and other concerned parents formed the First Educators Alliance (FEA). Each FEA parent commits to attend at least one monthly school board meeting. “Lack of presence is the reason they’ve been able to get away with this stuff over all these years,” said FEA representative, grandmother-of-nine Sara Lockwood. It was at one of those board meetings that parents discovered the district’s plans to test That’s A Family! in grades 4-8 and adopt it the following year. So FEA launched a letter-writing campaign and the “Street Corner Ministry”: Novato moms who distribute information from sidewalks about the gay agenda’s inroads into the classroom. The weekend before the board voted on That’s A Family!, mother-of-three Vanessa Wills spent her Saturday in front of a grocery store. “Almost every parent I talked to,” she told Citizen, “whether or not they agreed with the homosexual lifestyle, said the same thing: This is something that should be taught in home, not in the classroom.” Meanwhile, another group of parents joined forces to protect their quickly eroding parental rights. Calling themselves the Novato Parents and Family Coalition, they circulated a petition calling for parental control over how sexual lifestyles are addressed in the classroom — and collected more than 1,200 signatures in just three weeks. “When this agenda came to town, it was moral anthrax,” said one petition collector, Edison Fowler, whose wife is a first-grade teacher. “I saw them giving it to kids and nobody could see it, nobody knew it existed. . . . It’s that serious. “On the news you heard about people dying, and how they’d spend millions of dollars going through with gloves and sterile [equipment] to make sure nobody else got hurt. I thought, ‘We need to be that meticulous and that caring about what they are presenting to the hearts of children.’ Because once it goes in, it’s hidden. It’s undetectable, yet it continues to work.” Of the 1,200 people surveyed, said Fowler, only 7 percent knew about the upcoming curriculum vote. But by the time the school board met on Aug. 20, grassroots groups had changed that percentage. The meeting attracted a standing-room-only crowd of 300. And after five hours of public comments (the majority against the video), it was clear board members couldn’t test the video in four grade levels without serious political consequences. So they voted instead to introduce it only in fifth-grade “Family Life” sex education classes, which already have an “opt-out” option for parents who don’t want their children to attend. Though the video will still be seen by some students, getting it acknowledged for what it is — a lesson about sex, not “tolerance” — was an important win, said Pro-Family Law Center Director Scott Lively, because “the gay movement has taken a nearly universal goal among teachers and parents for students to be civil to one another and wrapped their own agenda in it. “They say that the only way students can respect each other is if they say homosexuality is good and normal.” But semantics meant little to fifth-grade teacher Lybe Crumpton, who still didn’t want to teach something that contradicted her Christian beliefs. So she confronted her principal. “I waited until lunch because I had to psych myself up all morning,” she told Citizen. “By the time I went in, I had come to the conclusion that if I lost my job over it, that was fine. “I said that I couldn’t in good faith or good conscience teach that curriculum to children.” For now, the principal has agreed to let her opt out since it is a pilot program, said Crumpton. But if it becomes core curriculum, there’ll be no choice for Crumpton. There will be a choice for Christian parents, though — to continue fighting for truly safe schools free of homosexual indoctrination. TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: educationnews; homosexualagenda; indoctrination; prisoners; publicschools
The relentless homosexual agenda pushes forward. Everytime I read one of these stories I feel so glad that my wife and I have elected to home school our son. To: CalConservative
Where do these kids get these ideas?  
» More From The Patriot-News Report of sex in kindergarten investigated
Saturday, November 23, 2002BY PETE SHELLEM
Of The Patriot-News Harrisburg School District and county authorities are investigating allegations that a 5-year-old kindergarten girl performed oral sex on a male classmate in school last week. City spokesman Randy King said the incident took place Nov. 15 in a classroom at Melrose Elementary School. It wasn't clear yesterday where the teacher was at the time. She left a memo for the principal detailing the incident before she went on leave earlier this week and has yet to be interviewed. King said the teacher has a terminally ill relative and is out of town. District officials learned of the incident after a classmate told her mother last weekend. The mother notified school district officials Monday, and they immediately launched an investigation. Harrisburg police have turned the matter over to county social service agencies because of the age of the children. There will be no criminal charges, King said, because of the children's age and because the act was not forced. "However, Children and Youth Services will be investigating the matter," King said. "Children of this age who engage in such conduct don't necessarily get this from television." The boy's mother contacted the news media yesterday, saying the school district was being unresponsive to her inquiries about the incident. The mother, whose name is being withheld by The Patriot-News to protect the identity of the child, said that when the girl who performed the act was questioned, she admitted she had done it. The mother said she wasn't immediately notified, and after she was, district officials told her the matter had been turned over to Dauphin County Children and Youth, told her to get her son counseling and refused to discuss it further. She said she is concerned for her son as well as the girl, because she feels a child exhibiting such behavior may be being abused. "This isn't kids fighting or cutting up in school," the mother said. "This is a serious matter." District solicitor Nate Waters said that while the incident has been turned over to social service agencies, it is still not clear exactly what happened. "Nobody that I have talked to has assured me that these things have happened," Waters said. "We don't want to keep on moving on with hearsay from 5-year-olds. We're currently attempting to contact the teacher and get some answers." Waters said he doesn't doubt the incident took place. "We're trying not to sensationalize 5-year-olds having sex," Waters said. "We don't want to alarm people who have 5-year-olds in classes all over the city. "This has never happened before to my knowledge and very likely is never going to happen again," he said. PETE SHELLEM: 255-8156 or pshellem@patriot-news.com
 
3 posted on Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:47:27 PM by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies] -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------- To: CalConservative
Us, too!
You can't fight the school system. It doesn't work that way anymore. Parents need to start homeschooling. It is the only way we'll be able to raise a generation of kids that have a moral background.
4 posted on Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:03:00 AM by ImaGraftedBranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies] -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------- To: CalConservative
bump 5 posted on Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:29:22 AM by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies] -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------- To: CalConservative
"...It’s sort of like having a mom and a dad love each other..."
Ah...No...It isn't !! !!
"...so glad that my wife and I have elected to home school..." Ours, too, it's great isn't it ?? ??
6 posted on Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:53:21 AM by Coto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies] -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------- To: CalConservative
By the time I went in, I had come to the conclusion that if I lost my job over it, that was fine.
It's infuriating to see the extortion that school districts use to push these perverse agendas on our kids. The moral conflict pushed on the teachers finally causes one to come to the end of the road and decide what their human values are worth. Do they become hypocrits and side with the homosexual lobby and teach this stuff; or do as this brave teacher did and stick with their spiritual convictions and tell the educational system to stick it. I know it's very unlikely, but if enough teachers did this;and parents withdrew their children for homeschooling, perhaps things might change.
7 posted on Thursday, December 05, 2002 1:35:50 AM by Rockyrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies] -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------- To: CalConservative
A kindergarten lesson included in the same curriculum called “Jesse’s Dream Skirt” tells a story about a little boy who is praised for wearing a dress to school.
The phrase, "...hell in a handbasket" leaps to mind.
8 posted on Thursday, December 05, 2002 1:44:32 AM by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies] -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------- Teacher Cynthia Huggett: “And I’m not going to let that happen. I will not stay here if that is going to happen. I will lose my job and wash dishes if I have to.”
Teacher Lybe Crumpton: "if I lost my job over it, that was fine. " ...
But if it becomes core curriculum, there’ll be no choice for Crumpton. No, it is not okay if they lose their jobs. Any teaching space vacated by a departing moral Christian teacher might be filled by someone who is either openly homosexual or simply tolerant of the homosexual indoctrination. I hope the good teachers can withstand the intimidation. Public schools are still the source of education/indoctrination for most students, and each teacher gets 30-200 students per year, so it is important for the next generation that the right people are the teachers. Public schools in California, where standardized test scores routinely rank the state near the bottom of the entire country, need to return to teaching the basics like math and reading instead of running social experiments on the children. These children will grow up to be our neighbors, employees/ers, teachers, and possibly future leaders. Parents can still object to sex-ed, but often they do not know the content of the lessons. Hopefully, caring teachers will inform parents about the objectionable content of the videos and encourage the parents to pull their children from the presentations. If they are allowed to, teachers should even provide a small reward to those students who bring opt-out forms or have a contest to collect as many opt-out forms as possible; after all, the PTA's use similar bribery of children to get their parents' donations.
9 posted on Thursday, December 05, 2002 3:24:08 AM by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies] -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------- To: CalConservative; EdReform; Khepera; ppaul; buffyt; L.N. Smithee; conserve-it; g'nad; ...
Thanks for the ping, CalConservative. I'll ping some more folks... Let me know if you want to be included or removed in future pings of this type.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/801027/posts
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Homosexual Agenda, click below:
   click here >>> Homosexual Agenda <<< click here    To: scripter
The pushing of the Predator Homosexual agenda in the public schools is just one of the crown jewels in the Party of Death. The Party of Death pushes abortion. Then, the children not aborted are programmed to become fresh meat for the gay predators. Those who succumb will have a very short and miserable life span. The Party of Death pushes the religion of Drug use versus a real religion. Again, those not aborted and who enter the world of the Religion of Drugs will have a very short and miserable life span. The Party of Death pushes these perverted forms of education versus good basic education. Again, those not aborted can spend 12 years and not have even an adequate education. This will condemn most of them to a life of minimum wages if they are lucky. This will lead to a very miserable life span. Those who get their worthless High School Diplomas go to college and spend their entire college years learning how to Hate America, hate capitalism, hate conservatives and waste years in phoney studies like black studies, Hispanic studies, lesbian studies, homosexual studies and other perverted classes. When they get their instant unemployment degrees, they have to go to work for one of the left wings non profits or for a paycheck at a government job. They bring even less than their peers with just a high school diploma to a job. They have no skills and are lucky to be hired as a line cook or some other long houred job. While on the job, they hate it and BLEEP about having a degree and only getting a minimum wage job. The party of death has aborted over 30 million of its babies, groomed hundreds of thousands to become fresh pieces of meat for predator homosexuals, ushered millions into the horrible world of drugs as a religion and then under educated the remainder. These self inflicted programs of genocide of the Party of Death has made their numbers shrink and will have even more impact re less of their ilk voting over the next two decades. They have practiced a deadkt Genocide on their own. This article is just another example of what the Party of Death pushes for those not aborted. Parents with children in school need to get them out when any of these vile brainwashings occur, or the parents see any of the patterns I have listed above. Home schooling will become the biggest cottage industry in America for parents who love their children. To: CalConservative
They are coming for your children. Stop them by any means necessary. To: heleny; CalConservative; Rockyrich; scripter; All
"Parents can still object to sex-ed, but often they do not know the content of the lessons. Hopefully, caring teachers will inform parents about the objectionable content of the videos and encourage the parents to pull their children from the presentations. If they are allowed to, teachers should even provide a small reward to those students who bring opt-out forms or have a contest to collect as many opt-out forms as possible..."
Here's one parents can use: Hatch Amendment Letter - Parental Consent Form for use in the Public Schools Additional information: How To Protect Your Children From PRO-HOMOSEXUALITY PROPAGANDA In Schools Activism in the Schools Seven Steps to Recruit-Proof Your Child Assemblyman MOUNTJOY opposes promotion of homosexuality in public schools To: EdReform
We have to keep outing what the predator homosexuals really want in the classrooms. That is fresh meat to replace those dying of aids each day due to their life style. Then we need to keep outing what the NEA has done to our schools re dumbing down the children and preparing them to take a choice of a shorter and miserable life style glorified by the Party of Death. To: CalConservative
TAKE YOUR KIDS OUT OF
PUBLIC SCHOOLS NOW! 16 posted on Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:55:53 AM by Johnny Gage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies] -------------------------------------------------------
------------------------- To: CalConservative
"“Making schools safe . . . is strongly tied to ensuring that classrooms are inclusive of LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender] themes,” said the Web site for one of the nation’s largest homosexual lobby groups — the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN)."
An introduction to GLSEN To: Grampa Dave
"Then we need to keep outing what the NEA has done to our schools re dumbing down the children and preparing them to take a choice of a shorter and miserable life style glorified by the Party of Death."
Many people are confused because the NEA calls itself an "Education Association." THE NEA IS A LABOR UNION! Teachers who want to belong to a Professional Education Association should consider joining the Association of American Educators (www.aaeteachers.org) instead of the Nation Education Association Union. The NEA is the fundraising arm of the 'Party of Death'. And their Homosexual Caucus is behind much of the homosexual indoctrination that's taking place in the public schools. I suspect that the NEA's Homosexual Caucus is in cahoots with GLSEN and wouldn't surprised if someone eventually discovered that teachers' union dues are actually supporting GLSEN in some way. That being said, we need to convince teachers to dump the NEA: Association of American Educators/'Grading the NEA' materials to hand out Help Defund the National Education Association Union Please pass this information on To: EdReform
So much class time is wasted on “sensitivity”, “diversity”, recycling and other such drivel.
As long as the kids are kept stupid, the schools will get increased tax dollars. Up here in MA, the NEA is against the MCAS tests. Too hard and unfair in their opinion. I know towns that take “gifted’ students into a separate class, denying the dummies the benefit to learn something from them. IMHO, our publik skrewls have turned into konsomols... a communist processing facility for socialist behavior and low achievement. I have only one problem against this article.
"It’s 1 o’clock in the morning and "27-year-old Lybe Crumpton is standing alone, shaking and on the verge of tears. No, she hasn’t been robbed. She’s a fifth-grade teacher who’s afraid her students might be harmed by the homosexual agenda." I'm a teacher and I don't shake and become "On the verge of tears"
Hell no, I fight.
Anything and everything Liberals can throw at me. To: EdReform
You posted, "The NEA is the fundraising arm of the 'Party of Death'. And their Homosexual Caucus is behind much of the homosexual indoctrination that's taking place in the public schools. I suspect that the NEA's Homosexual Caucus is in cahoots with GLSEN and wouldn't surprised if someone eventually discovered that teachers' union dues are actually supporting GLSEN in some way.
Some of these homosexual predators and strident gays were quite wealthy before the Clintoon market drop. I would not be surprised if donations went the reverse way, from the rich homosexual predators and strident gays into the coffers of the NEA. Also, how much of our tax $'s gets diverted to the NEA coffers directly, indirectly and covertly? To: CalConservative
That upsets Crumpton because she doesn’t think elementary-school kids are ready to discuss sexual lifestyles, especially one as physically and spiritually devastating as homosexuality.
Elementary school kids aren't ready to discuss sexuality of any type, much less the deviant strain. To: CalConservative
Geez, whenever I read about this type of forced learning,it makes it more difficult for me to say how proud I am to be born in California.Thank God it's up North,and I'm sure it'll create a stink when it eventually comes to L.A.---I can only wonder why 60 Minutes hasn't done a piece on this yet.<======Sarcasm To: CalConservative
"GLSEN’s executive director, Kevin Jennings, made no secret of that strategy while extolling homosexual activists’ inroads into Massachusetts schools a few years ago."
GLSEN's 'inroads into Massachusetts' To: EdReform
Example Offered of Real Homosexual Agenda in America's Schools
"The school board says it’s about harassment, it’s about tolerance. Well, what does GLSEN say?" she asks. "The executive director, Kevin Jennings, says that it is about promoting homosexuality. That’s what he said is his mission. Let me read you his quote. He said, ‘Promoting homosexuality -- we can make it happen. That is our mission from this day forward.’ " Folger describes the prospects as "frightening." "We had people that went into the GLSEN meetings. And make no mistake, this is not about tolerance in meeting with teachers -- it's about getting to the children," she says. "In fact, it was in that GLSEN meeting, locally held, that they said, 'We need this agreement to get to the children.' " Folger also has profanity-laced comments from Jennings on tape, where his attitude toward Christianity is clearly stated. "This is what he thinks," Folger says. "He said, ‘I don’t care what they think. Drop dead.’" Folger says increasingly, school boards across the country are acting as willing accomplices to the radical homosexual agenda. To: CalConservative; Grampa Dave; scripter
An excerpt from:
Homosexual Priests: A Time for Truth "... The homosexual movement has a history of trying to claw its way into places its agenda doesn’t belong, not for the betterment of mankind, but simply to legitimize and normalize perverse behavior. This is apparent in the all-too-common need of homosexuals to declare their sexuality rather than simply do the job they sign on to do. This is extremely detrimental—first, it creates conflict with others as most believe homosexuality to be wrong, and it shows that the full efforts of the employed homosexual are not going towards performing the task at hand but largely to declaring their lifestyle. When it comes to serious concerns such as the Church, schools, and the Boy Scouts that involve our children, we can’t take the risk of giving them this power to destroy the values we as parents try to instill, nor can we put our country’s welfare at stake by turning these pivotal foundational institutions and our military into homosexual social experiments. The homosexual movement is marked by two major tendencies: the tendency to continually infiltrate all good aspects of society; and once they have achieved that, the tendency to destroy this good. Public education, the Boy Scouts, the military, and now the Catholic Church have been targeted, and all have been hurt by the effects of homosexuality. The media and the Church must break its silence towards this enemy. If they do not, the people themselves must rise up and expose it..." To: EdReform
They have infiltrated our schools and churches for decades. It is not just Catholics. We had a homosexual predator Priest in his 50's in Santa Rosa area, (Episcopalian) a few years ago. Last year we hired a new Curate. I was not on the interviewing team, but I was asked by several friends on the team what to look for and how to avoid the potential problem that Santa Rosa had. I said that if a candidate looked and sounded reasonably good, you had to ask him/her if they believe in God, Christ, and the Resurrection of Christ. If they hemmed or hauled or acted evasive, stop the interview at that moment and go to the next candidate. Then, I said that on all final candidates that we had to run a police check on where they grew up, went to high school, college and other areas. (that is now standard for our church before any new hires). A couple of friends laughed at my first requirement that the candidates be a Christian. After a few candidates were interviewed and dropped because of that quesion, they stopped laughing. They could not believe that someone would spend all that time and money in seminary school and not believe in God and be a Christian. They now know there are a lot who are non believers who want to be Priests. We found a great believer, family man and father as our Curate. He is a great priest will be a great Priest wherever he moves on to after he finishes his contract with us. To: CalConservative; *Homosexual Agenda
Speaking of Gay Pride, you might want to see some Photos of Gays showing their pride at a Disney Gay outing. (Gays Predator Pride on Parade at a Disney World) 30 posted on Friday, December 06, 2002 11:49:00 AM by Grampa Dave
To: Grampa Dave
I said that if a candidate looked and sounded reasonably good, you had to ask him/her if they believe in God, Christ, and the Resurrection of Christ. If they hemmed or hauled or acted evasive, stop the interview at that moment and go to the next candidate.
My mother attends a Congregational church where she is the librarian. She has decided to step down and leave the church after trying to bring in solid Christian books against the direction of church leadership. The "minister" is pro-abortion, doesn't believe in miracles and denies the virgin birth and resurrection of Christ. It makes me wonder where his hope lies. They now understand the wisdom in your above advice. It's truly sad who poses as leaders in some churches. To: scripter
What the gay activists are trying to do in the public schools is sickening. I now understand why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. I wonder how long will it be before God gives these educratic thugs their just rewards. To: Grampa Dave
Speaking of Gay Pride, you might want to see some Photos of Gays showing their pride at a Disney Gay outing. (Gays Predator Pride on Parade at a Disney World)
The pictures are not there anymore. Do you have another source? I like to get these things out to as many people as possible and nothing tells the story like pictures! To: Grampa Dave; *Education News
"Also, how much of our tax $'s gets diverted to the NEA coffers directly, indirectly and covertly?"
In many states, teachers are required by law to join the NEA and the NEA's state affiliate. In other states, the NEA coerces teachers to join. Our taxes fund public schools and pay teachers. Teachers must pay anywhere from several hundred dollars to over $1000 per year in NEA dues. Now consider the following: Thy Voice In My Behalf: Teacher Union Political Spending "It’s typical for about half the money the union PACs collect in a cycle to be contributed to candidates or as soft money, while the rest is spent on administration, transfered to other PACs, or carried over to the next cycle. During the 1998 election cycle, NEA spent $1,853,390 in direct contributions. Most of these were in $10,000 chunks to House Democrats..." "Using the CRP database, EIA constructed a list of the top soft money contributors to state Democratic Party committees for all 50 states. In 25 states, NEA ranked in the top 30 contributors and took first place in four states (Florida, Maine, Michigan and Wisconsin)..." (EIA Reports) So at least part of your tax money is going to fund the DemoRATS via the NEA. This Week's News: Members File Class Action Suit Against NEA Members Insurance Trust Internal NEA sources tell EIA that a class action lawsuit has been filed against the union and the insurance arm of its Member Benefits Corporation for failing to distribute a $17.3 million windfall to members who participated in the members-only insurance plan. NEA offers perks through its Member Benefits Corporation that include credit cards, banking and mortgage services, and insurance. In December 2001, NEA held a group life insurance policy on behalf of some 400,000 members with the Prudential Insurance Company. That month, Prudential converted to a stockholders’ company, a process known as demutualization. It distributed shares of stock to all its policyholders, including some 600,000 shares to NEA that were valued at $17.3 million. The lawsuit arose from the fact that NEA itself holds the policy, not the individual members who participate. The union therefore felt justified in keeping the Prudential stock proceeds for the Members Insurance Trust itself rather than go through the cumbersome process of distributing payments of less than $40 to each of the member participants. An unidentified member, on behalf of a class of all participants in the NEA insurance program as of December 2001, filed suit in U.S. District Court, seeking distribution of the money to the members. That's $17.3 Million that the NEA wants to keep to fund their liberal agenda in the public schools. It's difficult to fight them when they have so much money. To: Scully
"A kindergarten lesson included in the same curriculum called “Jesse’s Dream Skirt” tells a story about a little boy who is praised for wearing a dress to school."
This is what the left means when they say tolerance. Don't just put up with out nonsense. We want you to praise us for it.
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
To: CalConservative
“The issue was the intolerance of the school district . . . that would force teachers to compromise their convictions as Christians.”
what about the cristian rights of the students made to watch this crap? This is why we homeschool our child also. Free Republic
FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

Carter FUNDED 911, OBAMA WILL FUND...?
MORE WINDFALL PROFITS TAX BY DEMOCRATS COMING
Dave Eberhart, NewsMax
Monday, April 29, 2002 http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/4/28/
112225.shtml
Former president Jimmy Carter, who has recently emerged as one of the Jewish state's most vocal critics for its current West Bank anti-terror policy, has been the recipient of tens of millions of dollars from Arab sources.
Recently, for example, Carter suggested that the U.S. government should threaten Israel with the possible loss of U.S. aid if it continues its military offensive in the West Bank.
high gas prices, bribing them democrats ain't cheap
He also said the U.S. should demand that U.S.-supplied weapons be used only for defensive purposes. Mr. Carter's views are often aired by the American media as those of a neutral mediator -- the man who engineered the 1979 Camp David Accords that has given Israel and Egypt a cold peace in the decades since. But far from being neutral, Carter has a track record as a long-time critic of Israel who has often displayed pro-Arab sympathies. It was his Carter Center that joined with the National Democratic Institute to put the seal of legitimacy on the first elections ever held by Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank in January 1996. Voters, who turned out in droves, elected Yasser Arafat president, and he has been in power ever since. CARTER CENTER, DEMOCRATS, ARABS, HIGH GAS PRICES, DUHHHH
In 1990 Carter ghostwrote a speech for Arafat, TERRORIST YASSIR ARAFAT In 1990 Carter ghostwrote a speech for Arafat, hoping to polish the Palestinian leader’s tarnished image as, at best, being soft on terrorism. THE JOKE'S ON US, TERRORIST Arafat won the Nobel Peace prize for the Oslo Accords. In 1989 President Carter interceded with Israeli Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin on behalf of activist Terry Boullata, a field worker for the Palestinian Human Rights Information Center. Boullata had been imprisoned in November 1987 for allegedly belonging to a terrorist organization called the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Boullata was allowed out in 1989 to come to the United States for treatment of hepatitis. The Carter Center: Follow the Money
NewsMax has reviewed annual reports that indicate millions of charitable dollars have flowed into the center from His Majesty Sultan Qaboss bin Said Al Said of Oman, Jordan, from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and from the Government of the United Arab Emirates. Furthermore, hundreds of thousands of dollars have been donated to the center by the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development. H.R.H. Prince Moulay Hicham Ben Abdallah of Morocco has also contributed tens of thousands of dollars.
to the JIMMY CARTER PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY, BRIBING THEM DEMOCRATS AIN'T CHEAP, HIGH GAS PRICES But it’s the financing behind Georgia’s Carter Center and the Jimmy Carter Library that raises serious doubts that the former president is, in actuality, a wholly neutral intermediary in the troubled region. SEE "HITLER'S MUFTI", WHO FLED TO EGYPT AFTER GERMANY FELL, ALONG WITH SS STORM TROOPS TAUGHT 2ND COUSIN ARAFAT TERRORISM.
CARTER HAS TIES TO HITLER.
ALSO, CASTRO HAD A MEETING OF COMMUNIST DICTATORS AND TERRORISTA, DEMOCRAT CARTER WAS RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF PHOTOS.
hitler paid his mufti, 10,000 a month 1940s money, room and board to broadcast jew hate on german radi NewsMax has reviewed annual reports that indicate
you idiots, think, high gas prices, bribes to democrats the jimmy carter presidential center
millions of charitable dollars have flowed into the center from His Majesty Sultan Qaboss bin Said Al Said of Oman, Jordan, from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and from the Government of the United Arab Emirates. donations to carter center are bribes stupid
democrat bribes=high gas prices, duh Furthermore, hundreds of thousands of dollars have been donated to the CARTER center by the Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development. H.R.H. Prince Moulay Hicham Ben Abdallah of Morocco has also contributed tens of thousands of dollars. There are no corresponding contributions apparent from Israeli sources, however. As the center’s literature describes, "The Carter Center and the Jimmy Carter Library were built in large measure thanks to the early leadership and financial support of the Carter Center founders.” Three of those generous founders: i'm sorry, democrats can't even balance a checkbook, and i'm try to talk economics to them?
democrats think the government is like a visa card, keep charging, never pay it back
um, duh, any money the government spends comes out of your check, got that? okay, supply and demand, someone makes so many dildos for liberals, but not enough, price goes up
that is called demand, how many are needed
if the supply, number in warehouse is more than the demand, number sold, they have a sale, price goes down
but if the supply, number in warehouse is less than demand for liberal rights march, price goes up, they have to make more dildos
that is supply and demand 101, if the government don't get involved
when the government gets involved, supply and demand becomes communism
meaning government controls price, manufacturing, and that don't even count trial lawyers and unions who really screw the system up
and, interestingly, trial lawyers and unions are the number 2 and 3 donors to the democrat party CARTER CENTER DONOR Agha Hasan Abedi On July 5 1991, banking regulators targeted Abedi’s Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), triggering a worldwide financial tidal wave. To date, accountants and lawyers have managed to recoup (discounting fees) $7 billion out of the $12 billion money pit that fueled the BCCI fraud.
camel races at the carter library?
Agha Hasan Abedi, a banker and self-styled mystic on first-name terms with Carter, created BCCI in 1972. Abedi had charmed seed money out of Arab sheikhs, organizing camel races and hunting trips. The Bank of America bought into BCCI as a way of buying access to the Middle East, holding a 30 percent stake at one point before dumping its holdings in the late-1970s. His Majesty King Fahd of Saudi Arabia Last month Saudi Arabia transferred $15.4 million in advance aid to the Palestinian Authority. The transfer was made to a controversial Arab League fund, a product of the recent Arab summit in Beirut. According to Arab spokesmen, the money was hurriedly contributed due to the dire plight of the Palestinian people as a result of "vicious Israeli aggression.” King Fahd, Crown Prince Abdullah and Defense Minister Prince Sultan jointly donated $4.8 million to launch the fund pot, while Interior Minister Prince Nayef bin Abdul Aziz sent an estimated $800,000 to the families of "155 Palestinian martyrs” killed in the current Israeli offensive. DONOR Hasib J. Sabbagh Sabbagh is the chairman of Consolidated Contractors Co. of Oman, Jordan. He is also the Senior Fellow for the Middle East of the Council on Foreign Relations. Founded in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations is a membership organization contributing ideas to U.S. foreign policy. The Council publishes Foreign Affairs, a leading journal on global issues. Individual, foundation, and corporate donors, together with multilateral development assistance programs, support the Carter Center’s current annual operating budget of around $30 million. Among the center’s announced priorities: promoting democracy, global development, human rights and conflict resolution. Carter said he has spent much time raising money, but he hopes that a campaign to raise a $150 million endowment will lighten the load. Phil Wise, the center’s executive director for operations, said an estimated $110 million has already been raised for the endowment. Carter on the Record Although Carter strongly condemned suicide bombings and criticized Arafat for not being more aggressive in ending the spate of violence against Israel, he roundly lambasted Ariel Sharon for actions and attitudes, past and present: "His rejection of all peace agreements that included Israeli withdrawal from Arab lands, his invasion of Lebanon, his provocative visit to the Temple Mount, the destruction of villages and homes, the arrests of thousands of Palestinians and his open defiance of President George W. Bush’s demand that he comply with international law have all been orchestrated to accomplish his ultimate goals: to establish Israeli settlements as widely as possible throughout occupied territories and to deny Palestinians a cohesive political existence,” Carter said in a recent New York Times piece. "It is time for the United States, as the sole recognized intermediary to consider more forceful actions for peace,” Carter added. "The rest of the world will welcome this leadership.” U.S. Leverage Over Israel Carter also said that U.S. aid of $10 million a day should give the U.S. some leverage over Israeli policy, noting that former president George H. Bush had threatened to cut off this assistance in 1992 to discourage the building of Israeli settlements between Jerusalem and Bethlehem. Carter cited another factor that could accelerate Israel’s acceptance of Arab normalization with Israel in return for its withdrawal from territory captured in the 1967 Middle East war: "One is the legal requirement that American weapons are to be used by Israel only for defensive purposes, a premise certainly being violated in the recent destruction in Jenin and other towns of the West Bank,” he said, noting this requirement was imposed by Richard Nixon to impede Israel’s military advance into Egypt during the 1973 Middle East war and ws used to deter Israeli attacks on Lebanon in 1979. "I understand the extreme political sensitivity in America of using persuasion on the Israelis, but it is important to remember that none of the actions toward peace would involve an encroachment on the sovereign territory of Israel,” Carter acknowledged. Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Israel
Middle East YOU WOULDN'T BELIEVE WHAT A JEW HATER, CARTER, GURU FOR DEMOCRATS, IS

bill gave iran the bomb, carter funded 911, how will hillary screwup?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp? ARTICLE_ID=49744
NUCLEAR WAR-FEAR Author: Bill Clinton gave Iran bomb plan
N.Y. Times reporter says harebrained scheme
to foil Tehran likely helped advance program
Posted: April 14, 2006
10:50 am Eastern © 2008 WorldNetDaily.com
CLINTON STUPIDER THAN IRANIANS
In his last year of office, President Clinton approved of an unusual scheme to transfer classified data that likely helped Iran advance its nuclear weapons program, according to New York Times reporter James Risen in his new book "State of War."
Risen says the CIA used a double-agent Russian scientist to hand over a blueprint for a nuclear bomb to Iran. The White House plan actually was to derail the Iranian program by passing on fatal flaws, says Risen, but the deliberate errors were so rudimentary they would have been easily fixed by Russian nuclear scientists, reported the online Post Chronicle, which said the story was recounted last night by radio host and former Justice official Mark Levin. Risen's book has been in the news for its revelations about the Bush administration's controversial NSA domestic anti- terror surveillance operation. The Clinton operation, in early 2000, was code named Operation Merlin and "may have been one of the most reckless operations in the modern history of the CIA," Risen writes. A defector from Russia was to offer Tehran the blueprint for a "firing set," the sophisticated mechanism that triggers a nuclear explosion. CIA officers told the Russian the Iranians already had that technology and the scheme was to find out the full extent of Tehran's nuclear capability. But the Russian inserted a note in the package indicating he could help fix the flaws if he were paid the right price. Iran's announcement Monday that it successfully has enriched uranium was the third major development this year on the way to producing an atomic bomb, leaving only one more step. That next development – metalizing the enriched uranium to fit it into a warhead – could come as soon as four months from now, says author Jerry Corsi, who has watched the predictions in his book "Atomic Iran" unfold since it was published one year ago. In a nationally televised speech Monday, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that with the production of enriched uranium, "I formally declare that Iran has joined the club of nuclear countries." The audience, which included top military commanders and clerics, broke into cheers of "Allahu akbar!" or "Allah is greatest!" In January, Iran successfully tested a missile with solid fuel, and last week, a U.S. official reported Iran now has ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads. Tehran has rejected a demand by the U.N. Security Council to stop all uranium enrichment activity by April 28. Related offers: MOST DANGEROUS NATION ON EARTH: Why America must wake up now and deal with Iran's imminent threat From WND Books – 'Atomic Iran' – Best-selling 'Unfit for Command' author exposes threat of nuclear terror 'Biggest threat to U.S. is nuclear terror' – Are you prepared? Get comprehensive free report now
OBAMA TAKES US BACK TO THE 50S, CUTS DEFENSE, BACK TO THE MIDDLE AGES, SHARIA LAW.
Previous stories:
Secretive group aims for Iran regime-change
Iran 1 step from atomic bomb
Iranian missiles can carry nukes
Report: Iranian youth defy ayatollah
200 cartoonists enter 'Holocaust contest'
Kohl: I didn't deny Holocaust
Iran report: Kohl denies Holocaust
Ahmadinejad to Iranians: Israel 'will be removed'
'Atomic Iran' warnings prove accurate
Iran leader: Islam to 'rule the world'
STUPID AMERICANS PUT A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE, AN ARAB, NOT EVEN BLACK
MY GREAT, GREAT GRANDAD CAME FROM GERMANY, CAN I GET GERMAN CITIZENSHIP?  NO.  OBAMA'S GRAND MA WAS BLACK?  SO, THAT MAKES HIM A MARTIAN?  WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?
Iran leader's messianic end-times mission
OH BOY, ANOTHER OBAMA
Iran to resume uranium enrichment
Reports: U.S. preparing military strike on Iran
Assassination attempt on Iran's Ahmadinejad?
Israel: Iran 3 months to nuclear point of no return  Copyright 1997-2008
All Rights Reserved. WorldNetDaily.com Inc.  
 
Today's WND
News Highlights  
FedEx the Supremes about Obama's eligibility
'Natural-born' requirement called 'stupidest provision'
Pravda raises Obama eligibility issue
Obama economic adviser was socialist party member?
Videomaker attacked for showing dearth of Dem knowledge
 
Today's WND
Commentary Highlights  
Our system is broken
- By Joseph Farah
The cleanest state meets the pushiest person
- By Ann Coulter
Sen. Clinton, just who is Zdenka Gast?
- By Jack Cashill
When genes predetermine our future
- By Phil Elmore
No American limp-wristedness in India
- By Erik Rush
The end of the constitutional republic?
- By Alan Keyes

THE MANHATTAN PROJECT
http://library.thinkquest.org/C001292/weapons.php?show=
2
 atoms amok .. nuclear weapons .. 2. Manhattan Project/WWII
The world was on the brink of war. Germany and Japan had already stirred up trouble in neighboring countries, and other nations, such as the United States, feared entry into the war. The idea of an atomic weapon had been presented, and the US felt that the Allied Nations must gain the power before the enemies. If it was up to you, would you have introduced the atomic bomb to the world? YESTERDAY'S GONE, MOVE ON, BUT DON'T BE STUPID, LEARN FROM THE PAST.  YOUR TEACHERS, PROFESSORS ARE COMMUNIST, LISTEN TO YOUR PARENTS, IF THEY'RE COMMUNIST READ UP ON "REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC" WHICH WE WOULD BE IF DEMOCRATS WEREN'T AROUND.  THEY'RE EVIL.
In times of war, desperate measures lead to technological breakthroughs. If a world war was not taking place at the time, do you think that the atomic bomb would have been invented so quickly? Do you think it would have ever even been created?
By 27 June 1940, when British intelligence decided that Germany was advancing rapidly in their nuclear research, Roosevelt was determined to get the United States' own project underway. He established several committees and sought contracts with several American companies and universities, including the Standard Oil Company, Columbia University, Princeton University, the University of Chicago, and the University of California. Favorable results were deemed possible as a British report stated the different ways a nuclear bomb could be constructed, and that one could be constructed in as little as two years, if full effort were put into the project. With this, the American nuclear program was even more heavily fueled, as the Office of Scientific Research and Development was formed. The effort to build an atomic bomb was then simply called "S-1". A day before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt ordered S-1 to do everything possible to build an atomic bomb. And still, all of this was happening in fear that Germany would otherwise develop the bomb first. By late 1942, the construction of a nuclear bomb seemed nearing reality. On 2 December, Enrico Fermi-the physicist leading the scientific research of the project-engineered the first man-made nuclear chain reaction ever at the University of Chicago. Such an experiment had never taken place before, and the risks were very high. In fact, conducting the experiment may not have been so clever, as the official history of the Atomic Energy Commission declared the decision to approve the experiment a "gamble with a possibly catastrophic experiment in one of the most densely populated areas of the nation." Luckily, Chicago did not blow up and Fermi's calculations had been correct. In the summer of 1942, Roosevelt handed the supervision of the project, which would from then on be called the Manhattan Project. Brigadier General Leslie Groves, who had supervised the construction of the Pentagon, was placed in charge of the project. Groves quickly set up the necessary facilities to build the bomb. In Oak Ridge, Tennessee, uranium-235 would be separated from the more abundant isotope, uranium-238, at the Clinton Engineer Works. At the Hanford Engineering Works (which now holds most of the nation's nuclear waste), near Pasco, Washington, plutonium was produced for the bomb that was later to be dropped on Nagasaki. Finally, the design and the development of the bombs themselves took place at a facility in Los Alamos, New Mexico. During the early part of the project, the United States and Britain had worked independently on their own developments of an atomic bomb. In June of 1942, though, the United States and Britain joined forces and formed an atomic alliance with each other. While the US would lead the project, British scientists would have access to all of the research and would be able to give a helping hand. Several prominent Americans working on the project did not recommend this alliance. Vannever Bush, chairman of the National Defense Research Committee, warned Roosevelt that this alliance "might well lead to extraordinary efforts on the part of Russia to establish its own position in the field secretly, and might lead to a clash, say 20 years from now." The Soviet Union had not even been informed of the construction of the atomic bomb into 1945. As days to the completion of the bomb diminished, people began wondering if the United States would actually use the bombs. Roosevelt had planned to use the bombs without consideration if an ultimatum, or demand, for immediate surrender was not accepted. The Army had been planning an wide scale invasion of Japan in hopes of bringing about surrender; this invasion would result in an estimated one million American casualties. Meanwhile, Roosevelt's time as president was coming to an end. His vice-president, Harry Truman, knew nothing of the purpose of the Manhattan project. In fact, during the 82 days that Truman served as vice president, he only met with Roosevelt twice, never discussing the atomic bomb. It wasn't until Roosevelt died that Truman found out about the project, at which time he supported the continuation, and was confident that it would be successful. And the project was successful. On the morning of 16 July 1945, the first atomic bomb, code-named TRINITY, was exploded at a test site at Alamagordo Air Force Base in New Mexico. Several witnesses were on hand for the magnificent explosion. General Groves was amazed by the blast reporting: an enormous fire ball as bright as several midday suns, a mushroom cloud that extended 41,000 feet into the sub-stratosphere, a tremendous crash that broke a window 125 miles away, a crater 1,200 feet in diameter, a crumpled forty-tone tower one-half mile from the